<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simplifying Interfaces &#187; Web Application Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/tag/web-application-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com</link>
	<description>Marc Van Rymenant's blog about User Experience and Behavioral Sciences applied to web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What is simplicity?</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/what-is-simplicity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/what-is-simplicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Application Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can you define something that is simple? Simplicity is indeed an abstract term.
Let’s have a look at some dictionaries, those works that since the 17th century have done an incredible effort of synthesizing all human experience, and see what they have to say about it.
It is terribly interesting to see that for the definition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/what-is-simplicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>La simplicité, c&#8217;est quoi ?</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/la-simplicite-cest-quoi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/la-simplicite-cest-quoi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Application Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment définir quelque chose de simple ? En effet, la simplicité est une abstraction.
Tournons-nous vers les dictionnaires, qui depuis le 17ème siècle font un travail incroyable de synthèse de toutes les expériences vécues par les êtres humains, pour tenter de trouver la définition de la simplicité.
C&#8217;est super intéressant de voir que pour définir quelque chose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/la-simplicite-cest-quoi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not all methods to generate simplicity are equal. Some are obtuse; others are shrewd and powerful</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/not-all-methods-to-generate-simplicity-are-equal-some-are-obtuse-others-are-shrewd-and-powerful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/not-all-methods-to-generate-simplicity-are-equal-some-are-obtuse-others-are-shrewd-and-powerful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Application Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not all methods to create a strong user experience are efficient. Worse still, some are quite the contrary !
Allow me to explain using an analysis of number representation by Denis Guedj (a professor in science history and epistemology at the university Paris VIII-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Guedj).
Roman numerals use letters: I, V, L, C, D, M, &#8230;
The problem with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/not-all-methods-to-generate-simplicity-are-equal-some-are-obtuse-others-are-shrewd-and-powerful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toutes les méthodes pour générer la simplicité ne se valent pas. Certaines sont poussives, d&#8217;autres astucieuses et puissantes</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/toutes-les-methodes-pour-generer-la-simplicite-ne-se-valent-pas-certaines-sont-poussives-dautres-astucieuses-et-puissantes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/toutes-les-methodes-pour-generer-la-simplicite-ne-se-valent-pas-certaines-sont-poussives-dautres-astucieuses-et-puissantes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Application Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pour partager cela avec vous, je me suis basé sur l&#8217;analyse des numérations de Denis Guedj (professeur d&#8217;histoire des sciences et d&#8217;épistémologie à l&#8217;université Paris VIII &#8211; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Guedj).
La numération romaine est composée de chiffres I, V, L, C, D, M, …
Le problème de cette méthode est qu&#8217;à chaque nombre supérieur à ceux déjà représentés il [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/02/toutes-les-methodes-pour-generer-la-simplicite-ne-se-valent-pas-certaines-sont-poussives-dautres-astucieuses-et-puissantes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
