<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simplifying Interfaces &#187; user testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/tag/user-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com</link>
	<description>Marc Van Rymenant's blog about User Experience and Behavioral Sciences applied to web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Neurosciences: the natural complement of traditional quantitative and qualitative tests</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2012/01/neurosciences-the-natural-complement-of-traditional-quantitative-and-qualitative-tests/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=neurosciences-the-natural-complement-of-traditional-quantitative-and-qualitative-tests</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2012/01/neurosciences-the-natural-complement-of-traditional-quantitative-and-qualitative-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurosciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UX design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several times a year, we meet people working in large organizations who have never been informed of the new possibilities of using neurosciences when conducting user tests. Over time, studies have evolved around two main principles: Quantitative tests, whose representativeness allows for an exact and precise research, based on a large number of testers. Qualitative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2012/01/neurosciences-the-natural-complement-of-traditional-quantitative-and-qualitative-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Les Neurosciences comme complément naturel des tests quanti et quali classiques</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2012/01/les-neurosciences-comme-complement-naturel-des-tests-quanti-et-quali-classiques/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=les-neurosciences-comme-complement-naturel-des-tests-quanti-et-quali-classiques</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2012/01/les-neurosciences-comme-complement-naturel-des-tests-quanti-et-quali-classiques/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurosciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plusieurs fois par an nous sommes confrontés à des personnes au sein des grandes organisations qui n&#8217;ont jamais été informées des nouvelles possibilités que proposent les neurosciences lors de la réalisation de tests utilisateurs. Au fil du temps, les études ont beaucoup évoluées autour de deux grands principes : les tests quantitatifs où la représentativité [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2012/01/les-neurosciences-comme-complement-naturel-des-tests-quanti-et-quali-classiques/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please, enough already!</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/01/please-enough-already/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=please-enough-already</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/01/please-enough-already/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Computer Interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interaction design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakob Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useit.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a December 2009 post (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/anybody-usability.html), useit.com claims that with little knowledge on the subject of usability and after only 3 days of testing, you can typically at least double your conversion rate or other key business metrics. On the other hand, it also says: &#8220;Many people without a grounding in behavioural user-research principles use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2010/01/please-enough-already/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s necessary to be careful with eyetracking studies. The Cuil example.</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/10/its_necessary_to_be_careful_with_eyetracking_studies/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its_necessary_to_be_careful_with_eyetracking_studies</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/10/its_necessary_to_be_careful_with_eyetracking_studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Knudsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphical User Interface Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An eyetracking study by Think Eyetracking, which has been widely spread on the Internet, announces the death of Cuil. It is based on ocular data.  Let’s take some time to analyze this.  The objective of a user test consists in gathering data on the behaviour of users while they are performing specific tasks on graphic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/10/its_necessary_to_be_careful_with_eyetracking_studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Il est important d&#8217;être prudent avec des résultats de eyetracking. Exemple avec Cuil.</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/10/il_est_important_detre_prudent_avec_du_eyetracking/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=il_est_important_detre_prudent_avec_du_eyetracking</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/10/il_est_important_detre_prudent_avec_du_eyetracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Knudsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphical User Interface Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Interface Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Une étude d&#8217;eyetracking ménée par Think Eyetracking, largement diffusée sur internet, annonce la mort de Cuil sur base de données oculaires. Prenons le temps d&#8217;analyser cela avec un peu plus de recul. L&#8217;objectif d&#8217;un test utilisateur est de récolter des données sur le comportement d&#8217;utilisateurs, lors de la réalisation de tâches spécifiques, sur des interfaces [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/10/il_est_important_detre_prudent_avec_du_eyetracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond the five-user assumption.</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/07/beyond-the-five-user-assumption/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=beyond-the-five-user-assumption</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/07/beyond-the-five-user-assumption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Faulkner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often talk about the power gurus have over the intellect of professionals working in usability.  By doing so I hope to give back the willingness and eagerness to think, instead of believing everything these gurus tell, without using our own brain and our own critical minds.  Here’s another example of this cerebral anaesthesia: the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/07/beyond-the-five-user-assumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 utilisateurs ne suffisent pas pour réaliser un test</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/07/5-utilisateurs-ne-suffisent-pas-pour-realiser-un-test/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=5-utilisateurs-ne-suffisent-pas-pour-realiser-un-test</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/07/5-utilisateurs-ne-suffisent-pas-pour-realiser-un-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Faulkner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Je parle souvent du pouvoir des gourus sur l&#8217;intellect des professionnels évoluant dans le domaine de la Usability. Mon espoir est de redonner à tous l&#8217;envie de réfléchir et de ne pas croire tout ce que ces gourus disent sans utiliser votre cerveau et votre sens critique. Voici encore un exemple parlant de cette anesthésie [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/07/5-utilisateurs-ne-suffisent-pas-pour-realiser-un-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

