<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simplifying Interfaces &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/tag/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com</link>
	<description>Marc Van Rymenant's blog about User Experience and Behavioral Sciences applied to web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:34:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ability to use is not simplicity to use</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/06/ability-to-use-is-not-simplicity-to-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/06/ability-to-use-is-not-simplicity-to-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ease of use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simplicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At conferences or meetings, a lot of people ask me the difference I make between usability and behavioural sciences. An answer to this question is indeed key to learn this profession and start off on the right basis. 
Usability means “ability to use”. This can be understood in two different ways.
 

For a human being, usability is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/06/ability-to-use-is-not-simplicity-to-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capacité d&#8217;utilisation ≠ facilité d&#8217;utilisation</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/06/capacite-d-utilisation-facilite-d-utilisation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/06/capacite-d-utilisation-facilite-d-utilisation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamental Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ease of use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simplicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ergotools.netway.lu/blog/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Au fil des conférences données et des rencontres effectuées, de nombreuses personnes m&#8217;ont demandé la différence que je faisais entre la &#8220;Usability&#8221; et les &#8220;Sciences comportementales&#8221;. Il est vrai que cette question est primordiale pour tout qui souhaite entreprendre ce métier avec de bonnes bases.
Le terme Usability signifie &#8220;Ability to use&#8221;. On peut aborder la [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/06/capacite-d-utilisation-facilite-d-utilisation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
