<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netway Interface Comfort Zone &#8482;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/08/netway-interface-comfort-zone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/08/netway-interface-comfort-zone/</link>
	<description>Marc Van Rymenant's blog about User Experience and Behavioral Sciences applied to web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:11:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JurgenW</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/08/netway-interface-comfort-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>JurgenW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=72#comment-130</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think he used a square monitor to do the experiments...

What I would find interesting is to get information about how the switch to 16:9 displays is going to affect website usability. I don&#039;t have one so I don&#039;t know but I can imagine people put two windows next to each other instead of one full screen webpage.

And wat about the increased resolution. Because I&#039;m use to seeing the resolutions used by professionals I&#039;ve noticed that people still keep upping their resolution, but are not increasing the size of icons and text.

Based on Fitt&#039;s law, that would increase the time to hit a target.  

However when they see my screen at 1024x768 or 1280xWhatever they always ask what is wrong with me. :-)

How do you think greater screens and resolutions affect websites. On a fullHD screen of the same size you could fit almost 4 screens at the same size and resolution as before on a 1024x768.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think he used a square monitor to do the experiments&#8230;</p>
<p>What I would find interesting is to get information about how the switch to 16:9 displays is going to affect website usability. I don&#8217;t have one so I don&#8217;t know but I can imagine people put two windows next to each other instead of one full screen webpage.</p>
<p>And wat about the increased resolution. Because I&#8217;m use to seeing the resolutions used by professionals I&#8217;ve noticed that people still keep upping their resolution, but are not increasing the size of icons and text.</p>
<p>Based on Fitt&#8217;s law, that would increase the time to hit a target.  </p>
<p>However when they see my screen at 1024&#215;768 or 1280xWhatever they always ask what is wrong with me. <img src='http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>How do you think greater screens and resolutions affect websites. On a fullHD screen of the same size you could fit almost 4 screens at the same size and resolution as before on a 1024&#215;768.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anucreative</title>
		<link>http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/2008/08/netway-interface-comfort-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>anucreative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplifyinginterfaces.com/?p=72#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Marc,

While I&#039;m not in a position to argue with your science I take issue with your example screenshots. The shots you use look basically square (including browser chrome) whereas I don&#039;t think this is the case for most people (a more common ratio of 4:3 landscape). 

Visualising this 20% Discomfort Zone on a landscape window makes the findings a *lot* different (and I&#039;d suggest would nullify your examples).

There is, of course, debate over how many users browse full screen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marc,</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not in a position to argue with your science I take issue with your example screenshots. The shots you use look basically square (including browser chrome) whereas I don&#8217;t think this is the case for most people (a more common ratio of 4:3 landscape). </p>
<p>Visualising this 20% Discomfort Zone on a landscape window makes the findings a *lot* different (and I&#8217;d suggest would nullify your examples).</p>
<p>There is, of course, debate over how many users browse full screen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
